Sunday, June 30, 2013

Boosting Play Value




The frequent use of the phrase open-ended qualifying toys and materials in order to signal rich, elaborate play raises a flag for me. I catch myself using this phrase as well. For me it serves as an intentional cue that I mean real toys and materials: ones without bells and whistles, ones without the faces of mascots or the voices of commercial characters.

Drilling down on terms like real play materials or true toys mentioned in the recent American Academy of Pediatrics report on play, (or open-ended, for that matter) is, in my mind, about getting at a deeper understanding of high play value of objects for children. High play value engages children’s interests, invites them to use their imaginations and ingenuity, and holds their attention. Especially when children play in the same setting day-after-day with the same objects and materials, play in groups, or are older with greater potential to engage in elaborate play, high play value is important in providing new possibilities and discoveries for all types of play– social, physical, object, or as if play.

Consideration of high play value is, by no means, limited to toys and not every play object enjoys high play value. Fortunately, boosting the play value of most play objects, materials, true toys, and even ho-hum objects is not only possible, but also easy to take on. Most any play outfitter, whether a parent, teacher, grandparent, aunt or uncle, babysitter or nanny, neighbor, teacher, older sister or brother, can amp up play value across ages, genders and settings. Play value can increase with thoughtful attention, resourcefulness, and selecting for:
• Loose parts
• Abundance
• Generative capacity
• Complexity


Loose Parts
The theory of loose parts proposed by architect Simon Nicholson in the 1970’s has enjoyed a resurgence recently with increasing interest in assuring that children enjoy rich play experiences. Nicholson believed that loose parts in an environment offer enormous possibilities and invite creativity that is unlikely in settings with only fixed elements.

Loose parts in the play yard
Loose parts unleash children’s imaginations and their spirit to play. They feed imaginations, inspire scripts and stories, fill children’s pockets and backpacks, elaborate structures, and build familiarity and confidence with the principles and properties of materials and tools. Children’s control of their environment increases significantly with the addition of stuff that they can move, combine, and recombine. They become not only the directors of their play, but also shapers of their settings.


Environments–indoor and out, large-scale, room-sized, and table-top–are richer places for play with portable, totable, manipulable, changeable objects and materials. Virtually every corner of our lives is a source of loose parts: sand and water, sticks and stones; seeds and leaves, pods and pinecones; plastic crates and sofa cushions, duct tape and clothespins; hoses and tubing, sieves and shovels; boards and boxes, rope and string.

More and more loose parts are filling maker spaces, populating building platforms, and loosening up playgrounds. Adding new, or more, loose parts from one day to the next changes a space or modifies an activity. A box becomes a treasure chest; a cushion serves as a trapdoor; a wooden spoon is a wand, an oar, and then a doll. Tree cookies are wheels one minute, plates the next, and towers the next.


Multiplying Possibilities
When a single object joins a large crowd of similar, if not identical, objects, its play possibilities expand significantly. This is the abundance that fuels play and increases play value.

Buttons, buttons, buttons
A child may use a solitary cardboard tube as a specific object like a telescope, a sword, or a megaphone. Yet, add a dozen or more tubes to the setting and a child or group of children make the tubes into pillars, posts, supports for a building. Quantity blows a second wind on children’s play, inspiring a story of a crashed-up raft, a race to build a space station, or construction of a ball maze. Similarly, a single sponge may be used for washing while dozens of sponges become building block, cars, bumpers, or skates. A lone swimming noodle is, well, a noodle or a snake, while one hundred noodles becomes a noodle forest.

If, as Martin Buber says, “Play is the exultation of the possible,” then abundance is a trumpet call to children to exult. Quantities fascinate. Even humble objects, like Dixie cups, pinecones, toilet paper rolls, or metal washers assume an aura of richness or magnificence when present in vast quantities. These objects are easy to gather and at little expense, but offer great play value. Great quantities invites children to entertain a grand, even extravagant idea, one worth being lost in–exploring big numbers, buying the Moon with bottle caps, or building a tower to the sky. In groups, everyone–each child–can have her own stockpile of leaves, sheets of cardboard, stash of clothespins, bin of ping-pong balls, or sheets of stickers; and all can find the possibilities of sharing in abundance.

While pure abundance is not always necessary, thinking about the quantities of play objects and materials for children’s play is.


Generative Capacity
Toys, play objects, or materials with greater generative capacity enjoy considerable play value themselves: they can be played with in various ways. What really distinguishes, however, are qualities they have that activate or modify the attributes of other materials or objects in ways that add to their play value.

Children build with boxes; they stack them and knock them down, open-and-close them, and line them up like a train. Children might even get inside of a box and try to see if they fit. Inevitably children use the volume of boxes and some times their size and lightness in combination with other materials for another play episode. They add rocks or blocks and fill the box, use it to move or hide other objects. With a shake and a jiggle, children discover the box intensifies the sound of chestnuts rolling around inside. A box has generative capacity as do mirrors, tape, wire, balls, and tubes.

Stretchy is generative
A stretchy circle, a rubber band has generative capacity and is alive with possibilities for binding, bundling, snapping, and propelling objects. A recent video of twin toddlers fascinated with rubber bands illustrates the generative play value of this familiar object for even very young children.

Sticky, stretchy, sparkly, springy, pointy, perforated, and absorptive are among some of the generative qualities children use to investigate and improvise. They manipulate them in various ways and combine them with other materials to amplify possibilities for their play, whether it is imaginative, large motor, or playing as if.


Seeking Complexity
Recently I recalled a scheme for engaging children’s interest and attention in play that suggests an additional approach to increasing play value: complexity. Using research done at Pacific Oaks College, Sybil Kritchevsky, Elizabeth Prescott and Lee Walling developed the idea of simple, complex, and super units in a preschool environment, presented in Planning Environments for Young Children: Physical Space. 

A simple unit is a material with one obvious use, like clay or sand. A complex unit has two essentially different
A magnifier at the water table opens possibilities
parts or materials; put the clay on the table or introduce tools to the sand area. A super unit has three or more materials; add tools to the clay on the table, or add water to the sand and tools. Moving from a simple to a complex to a super unit significantly increases children’s engagement.

This scheme suggests the potential of going beyond increasing objects or relying on the effect of sticky, stretchy, or shiny attributes–although they are important. Interactions of materials or objects that modify the properties and change other play materials or toys increase complexity. They open and cue new directions, choices, and possibilities­ in ways that extend children’s interest and attention and invite them to elaborate on their play. While borrowed from a preschool setting, complexity works in a wider array of play environments–a museum, park, playground, backyard, beach, or nature center.

Water changes sand so children can change it more
Water changes sand’s qualities to make playing with it sufficiently different from playing with dry sand. Digging deep and sculpting wet sand that holds its shape when pressed, pinched, carved, or molded is very different from sweeping and sifting dry sand. Adding light modifies a space and objects, altering the appearance of surfaces; the shadows of objects, hands, and bodies that it casts become objects of play themselves, moving, growing, shrinking, and disappearing. Fabric encloses, conceals, and absorbs; it can be cut, pinned, and sewn together again. A large piece of fabric, like a bed sheet, can divide space, capture shadows and, stretched tight, it can toss objects (and children) into the air.

Mirrors; tape, fasteners and adhesives; tools that pierce, cut and drill; movement; and changing heights and inclines also increase complexity. They introduce new possibilities, revealing properties of other objects that make them more interesting to explore, use, and put into play.


Expanding Play Potential
Instead of reaching deeper into our vocabulary lists to cue a sincere interest in providing rich play for children,
Sand+light+color+tools
perhaps we really need to push ourselves harder to find and make available a rich range of objects and materials that inspire, enrich, and extend children’s play. We can start with sharpening our alertness to the attributes of materials and objects and what they bring to play . We can tap our own imaginations to see new possibilities for play in everyday materials. We can explore our surroundings for toys and materials and places to play that go far beyond the usual. 


What play objects, materials and toys are on your list that expand the possibilities of what happens during play?

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Subscribe to Museum Notes


Summer Greetings!

Tsvetnoy Central Market (Photo: Lifschutz-DavidsonSandilands)

While summer is taking hold and the next Museum Notes post is percolating, I wanted to let you know that, if you haven't already heard, Google will retire Google Reader July 1st: http://googlereader.blogspot.com
That will make  a difference to you if you currently use Google Reader to follow Museum Notes. 

If you would like to continue to follow my blog–and I hope you do–please consider switching to another way of subscribing. I suggest following by email. To do so, just click the Follow by Email link in the upper right side of the blog and follow the options to sign up. It should be simple. If you have any questions, please contact me using the comment option or email me directly: jwverg@earthlink.net.

For more information, you might also check out the link that Paul Orselli put on his ExhibiTricks blog in March when Google first announced it would be retiring Google Reader: http://www.copyblogger.com/google-reader-alternatives/ Thank you, Paul, and thank you, readers. I appreciate your interest in Museum Notes.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

The Play Outfitter


For those concerned about the presence of play in children’s lives, the recent appearance of books, studies, and reports that promote to play and its benefits should be encouraging. Here are just 3 highlights.

• The American Academy of Pediatrics recently revised its 2007 clinical report, “The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds.” It affirms that play is essential to the social, emotional, cognitive, and physical well-being of children beginning in early childhood.
Alliance for Childhood will be publishing “Adventure: The value of risk in children’s play” this summer which looks at the importance of risk for children’s healthy development.
American Journal of Play from The Strong explores play in its fullness, deepens our understanding of its dimensions and value, and brings a credibility to play with academic and international perspectives.

A lot has been happening on the play front in about the last 5 years. These and other studies and resources are making abundantly clear that children’s free, self-directed, play enhances resilience, creativity, social understanding, emotional, and cognitive control, and resistance to stress. This is not a tepid endorsement for the value of what children love to do and do naturally. For some reason, however, this not so secret strategy for success struggles to find broad, gripping traction.

Mounds of mud for play
Having over-scheduled children’s free-time and scoured our yards and playgrounds of loose parts for safety and convenience, we may now need to back up and revisit what, at its most basic, could readily engage children in play. Perhaps if children had lots of loose parts, mounds of mud, messy garages, piles of junk holding up an outbuilding or two, or tinkery basements where they could harvest stuff, they would be playing in that whole-hearted don’t call us in until dark spirit of play. Unfortunately, too few children are able to do that.

Always and Forever in Play
Every so often I come across lists of what people consider the best toys or play objects for children. I am interested in scanning the lists and thinking about the nature of the items–how universal, commercial, educational, natural, nostalgic, novel, everyday, ubiquitous, or adult-defined they are. How are these objects likely to engage children’s play? In what ways do they extend children’s play that other toys are less likely to? What do these lists say about play and, more specifically, about our view of children’s play?

One list I made note of was that of Howard Chudacoff, author of Children at Play: An American History and a professor at Brown University. In an interview with the American Journal of Play, he said he is often asked to name the 3 best toys. His choices are a:
• Stick • Ball • Box

Wired’s GeekDad posted 5 time-tested and child-approved items that no child should be without. These items fit easily within any budget and are appropriate for a wide age range. He recommends a:
• Stick • Box • String • Cardboard Tube  • Dirt

On Providence Children’s Museums’ Playwatch listserv a reader responded to GeekDad’s list with 5 items:
• Water • Blanket • Chair • Bubble Wrap • Tape

Princess Summerfall Winterspring added a seasonal variation with:
• Shadows and Silhouettes • Leaves • Snow and Ice • Mud

Thinking about  the children in the family daycare she runs with her sister and what they will play with always and forever, Nina listed:
• Tape • Boxes • Blocks

Paula Meijerink of WANTED Landscape considered outdoor play at the recent InterActivity 2013 in mentioning:
• Dirt • Critters • Matter that Deteriorates

Loose Parts and True Toys
Little hands, big hands at play
The items on these lists are not just sweet, familiar, or harken back to simpler times. They also have substantial play value. Children get a lot of play out of boxes, tubes, tape, string, and sticks. The collection can be extended to water, wire, fabric, wood pieces, rubber bands, paper, blankets, and clothespins. Easily moved, lifted, transformed, combined and recombined, these are loose parts that activate and engage a child’s disposition to play. Their play possibilities elicit a full range of play–sensory, constructive, imaginative, large motor–individually and sometimes richly blended in extended play episodes.

The American Academy of Pediatrics’ report refers to "true toys,” ones that engage children’s interest, invite them to use their imaginations and ingenuity, and hold their attention. “True toys” leave room for children to direct their own play and tend to develop with the child; they are not strongly gender specific. 

This was very apparent recently in how children 18 months to 8 years, and both boys and girls who I was observing used tape, tubes, fabric, sticks and string for building and making. Comfortable in multiple contexts, children work wonders on cardboard boxes indoors and out; in small city spaces, suburban lots, and rural landscapes; in yards, schools, daycares, and museums. These play materials are everyday, easy to round up, and, as GeekDad points out, affordable.

Step Right Up At The Play Outfitter
Traces of taping
Outfitters provide specialty equipment, supplies, and gear for canoeing, hunting, fishing, skiing, and trail riding so the experience is top notch: safe, easy, enjoyable, and without unnecessary interruptions. Those who enjoy a sport or hobby–their type of play–enjoy it even more when well prepared and well outfitted. It is no different for children's play. Why not a play outfitter? 

The play outfitter fills a hole in the high-quality experiences we hope children will enjoy in the backyard, nature center, park, bedroom, garage, attic, playground, museum, beach, barn, cabin, cottage, campsite, or classroom. Many people can, and should, fulfill the role of play outfitter: a mom, dad, aunt, uncle, grandparent, daycare provider, nanny, teacher, babysitter, friendly neighbor, or scout leader. Actually, there’s no reason children themselves cannot be play outfitters.

Well-supplied at the Play Outfitter's
Working with the lists above, expanding on them, drawing on previous experience and observation, and responding to preferences, a play outfitter might stock up on cardboard tubes, string, dirt, tape, clothespins, buckets, and fabric. They might make water, scissors, grommets, or paper and pencils available. Consideration is always appropriate about whether to offer a wide variety of play objects and materials or a few in larger quantities. A play outfitter takes cues from the players they are serving.

The play outfitter would be a strong addition to a variety of settings. Imagine the Play Outfitters at a museum as part of a building zone, maker space, or outdoor play yard. Children step up and inspect what’s available. They select interesting play supplies that they are curious about or choose specific materials they need to explore an idea or make something. Their requests, describing what they need, estimating necessary quantities, and naming related gear and tools offer new ways for them to direct their play as well as expanding on and enriching the play experience.

Perhaps The Play Outfitter could become a new version of the grocery store exhibit as a place where children buy the cardboard tubes, clothespins, boxes, sticks, string, and fabric that they need for another aspect of their well-being–their play.



“….magic is in the child’s mind rather than in the toy…”

Yi-Fu Tuan in Passing Strange and Wonderful

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Following the Thread of Practice

 



Practice describes what we do everyday in our professional lives; what we do regularly and hope to do well. We refer to museum practice, follow best practice, and recognize promising practices. Familiar, well-used, and versatile, practice is also a vague and sometimes confusing term.  

Evidence that practice is of significant interest across our field comes through in multiple projects and initiatives that explore practice. At the same time, each project, study, and journal issue uses differing approaches and contexts. Sometimes practice is virtually interchangeable with standards. For instance, a set of practices is covered in a manual for professional standards for art museum curators. Similarly, EdCom’s Excellence in Practice: Museum Education Principles and Standards lays out broad ways in which principles and standards define practice in three areas. The July 2012 issue of the Journal of Museum Education focused on professionalizing practice as a way to explore recent professional history and better inform present practice. Initiatives like In Principle, In Practice have focused on connections between research, evaluation, and practice as a way of enhancing the value of informal learning. The National Association for Interpretation has developed standards and practices defining and distinguishing among good-better-best practices in dozens of areas.

This limited sampling reflects the great and undifferentiated territory between the broad umbrella of museum practice as a profession and a specific practice such as greet every visitor. Practice is applied as readily to the museum field as to a particular museum; to a 4,000 or 400,000 square foot museum. In one breath, practice encompasses how museum educators, exhibit designers, curators of community engagement, playworkers, and evaluators execute their duties and responsibilities everyday, and does so without really ever defining practice.

So what does practice actually cover? Practice might be the internalized professional knowledge that guides choices and behaviors and is applied consistently to a museum’s important work. Practice can also be the accumulated small gestures related to timing, space, materials, and relationships in which specific content is secondary. Practice is sometimes referred to as praxis, the “process through which theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realized; or engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas”. 

Practice may not need to be defined precisely, but differences should be clear between a practice shared across the field, like reflecting a community’s diversity in staff and board and a museum-specific practice such as using materials and vendors within a 100-mile radius. Pursuing, comparing, replicating, or improving a practice is difficult when it is aspirational in one museum, a standard in another, and a policy in still another.

Viewing practice as doing is easy. It is also a limiting view. Without knowing and thinking, without connecting to a larger purpose, a practice lacks direction, leans into habit, and has a narrow impact.  

The value of practice, or a body of practice, expands when it is clarified,  connected to a museum’s larger purpose and philosophies, shared among colleagues, and revisited often and collectively.


Cracking Open Practice
Opal School at the Portland Children’s Museum has a practice of “cracking open words” to get at the worlds within words that each child, even the very youngest, has. Cracking open practice gets inside the sometimes dense assumptions, elements, and relationships that may be unrecognized, overlooked or taken for granted in pursuing practice. Unpacking shared and valued practices within a museum brings with it a deepening understanding of them; the opportunity to elaborate on, strengthen, and revise them; and the energy needed to sustain them.

Shared understanding. While practices may be implemented by individuals, they are stronger, with greater impact, and more likely to be sustained if the perspectives of many are engaged and their efforts are aligned. Developing a shared understanding might start by co-constructing a shared definition of practice, or an area of museum practice, in areas that members of a group are interested and invested. The group might also consider which practices are core (and why) and shared across the museum or which principles and practices defined by professional groups are valuable and to be adapted.

Connected to a larger set of ideas. Practices need to be connected. When too granular or isolated, they float, they lack heft and direction. Practices need to be tethered to something larger. It might be a museum’s purpose; a positive image of the community’s future; a view of learning; or an understanding of the learner. Practices also need to be related to other practices, to mutually support and strengthen one another. Asking open-ended questions, for instance, is a practice that benefits from a practice of careful listening to others, listening to thinking, in particular. A practice of listening is strengthened by a practice of reflection and bringing meaning to an experience.

Possibilities put into action. Practice is an expression of what we anticipate the difference a set of related actions might make when implemented. Ideas might be about how material, space, time, gesture, or guidance can extend exploration, increase interaction among family members, or encourage persistence. In this respect, practice is testing a hunch. Although often contrasted with theory, practice is, in fact, a temporary, or provisional theory, one put into everyday, real-world use. Carlina Rinaldi, President of Reggio Children says, “There is no theory except in practice. Practice is not real if it is not infused with and grounded in theory. They don’t exist without each other,

Reflected on and documented. Gaps between our hopes in enacting a practice and what actually happens when we do implement it are inevitable. Practice is a constant dynamic between what we want to do and are able to do, with each replication successively narrowing the gap. Reflection, a practice in itself, helps in seeing more clearly into the nature of the gaps and navigating them. Through reflection, engaging in lively dialogue, listening, and questioning–especially with others–practice deepens everyone’s understanding, generates new insights, and helps in developing new possibilities for practice.

What have you and your colleagues found when you cracked open practices, clarified, shared, applied, and revised them?


The Continuity of Practice
Practice is a thread that connects everyday actions and choices with what is of enduring importance. Reaching in many directions, the threads of practice run through aspirations for our communities, the interests of our museums, what we do to advance them, and even how we see ourselves as practitioners. In thoughtfully and deliberately exploring powerful ideas, in co-constructing meaning with colleagues, and in taking action, we are fully inhabiting our practice. Through this extended and on-going process, practice evolves, we grow as a community of learners, and we arrive at places of new perspective and possibility.


Thursday, May 9, 2013

More Than Collegial




For more than 20 years I have been attending InterActivity, the Association of Children’s Museums’ annual conference. I have appreciated the why of the conference: strengthening children’s museums by building a shared identity and increasing capacity across the field. I have also really enjoyed the what: a three-day gathering of colleagues from across the world exchanging ideas, accomplishments and enthusiasm in formal sessions, casual gatherings, and evening events. And I have enjoyed the how of the conference, a collegial gathering of people serving the field as trustees, directors, educators, visitor services, marketing, fundraising, finance and design; from within museums and without; seasoned professionals, and newcomers.

Friends and professional acquaintances from other fields have often commented to me, and somewhat enviously, about how collegial children’s museums are as a field. Strong relationships, personal connections, and inclusive informal networks; mentoring; generously sharing ideas, resources, and lessons learned; and extending appreciation and recognition of others’ successes and accomplishments.

Like most years, I reflected on the collegial feel of the conference this year. I began to consider ways in which it was, perhaps, more than collegial and was, in fact, also congenial and amiable. The warm-hearted welcomes and big-hearted hellos are generously extended to friends, past co-workers and partners as well as to new attendees from Naperville, East Aurora, Charleston, and Portland. ACM board members took the time to greet participants at the entrance of sessions. They also walked through the Marketplace and greeted each vendor individually. Hotel staff was friendly, responsive, and helpful. Meredith at the Wyndham was extraordinarily helpful in resolving a colleague’s hotel room issue. Moreover, she was gracious, as if correcting the problem was her pleasure. Tech staff, I heard, was very good. Hotel housekeeping greeted me every morning cheerfully and warmly.

This is not to imply that the conference or field is roses and rainbows, brittle with politeness, or lacking in divergent perspectives. Several colleagues have recently raised questions about the Reimagining Children’s Museums initiative. At the same time, they have expressed appreciation for the initiative's intent and the team's effort and left open the possibility that there might be something not yet coming through in the designs. This is in the spirit or more than collegial.

Small Question, Big Heart
On the last morning of the conference, picture writer Eric Carle received the 2013 ACM Great Friend to Kids Award that recognized Carle’s lively and prolific picture books, his generosity in sharing techniques and papers, and his contribution of The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art. An interview with Eric Carle by Larry Berger of The Saturday Lightning Brigade Radio following the award ceremony opened with a great question. It not only echoed the Great Friend award itself, but also revealed a broader expression of kindness. Larry asked Eric Carle, “Who was a friend to you when you were a child?” The careful construction of “who was a friend to you” rang with the implication of friendship as an investment in a child.  Eric Carle’s list of such friends was long and started with Miss Fricke his teacher (and others) who noticed Carle’s spark. Larry Berg also suggested that everyone in the audience had a friend who took an interest and had opportunities to be a friend to children.

This is the kind of moment that defines a congenial and amiable field and one it should enjoy and promote often and in many ways. With a focus on play that often starts with attunement play, children’s museums have every reason to be more than collegial. We have Michael Spock to thank for clarifying that children’s museums are about people and for someone–children.

Pervasive-Everywhere Conviviality
We talk about a pervasive-everywhere children’s museum. The lovely ways in which children’s museums are warm and welcoming, congenial, and amiable could only be better if these qualities were also pervasive.

Everyday children’s museum’s welcome children, very young children who are out on their first big adventures in the world. These children can find friends, kindness, respect, cordiality, and responsiveness at the front desk, in the elevators or on the stairs, at the facepainting cart, the top of the climber or the water table. The father of 4-year son Linus said that from visiting the children’s museum, his son knew that there are 7 people who greet him at the front desk, know him by name and think he has ideas worth listening to. This has done more than anything to fill Linus with confidence and joy. The 7 people at the front desk are being a friend to Linus.
  
Personal and professional risk-taking is not at all at odds with a gentle, gracious, and amiable professional context. I also love strategy and future trends. Learning by the seat of my pants keeps me on my toes. Being off-kilter is invigorating. Hope, as much as strategy, can and should guide and inspire our museums to be valuable and sustainable across many dimensions. We can gauge our value as much by generosity as by metrics. I am pleased that children’s museums are places where joy just might be one of those metrics.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Heading Out With Questions



The spring conference season for museums has arrived. Next week is InterActivity 2013 hosted by the Association of Children’s Museums and Pittsburgh Children’s Museum. May 19-22, the American Alliance of Museums hosts its 2013 Annual Meeting and Museum Expo in Baltimore.

Usually I return from conferences invigorated by questions posed by presenters, asked by participants, and overheard during breaks. I fully expect that after four days of sessions including the Reimaging Children’s Museums design seminar, I will have gathered questions and resources to follow-up on and think about over the next year.

This year, however, I am also heading out to the conference with a set of questions. I hope to ask and listen to colleagues noodle on a few blog topics that have been floating through my mind. I am certain my thinking will be sharper and the posts more interesting and relevant if others’ perspectives and insights are folded in. 

Play Outfitters. Outfitters provide specialty equipment and supplies for canoeing, hunting, fishing, skiing, and trail riding so the experience is top notch–easy, enjoyable, without unnecessary interruptions, and safe.  What is the scope of play outfitters?
  • What equipment, materials, objects, play things, or support should a play outfitter provide? How does outfitting for play change with the seasons? What are particularly great additions for toddlers, young children? and children in early and middle childhood?

A Question of Practice. Practice is what we do everyday in our professional lives. We refer to museum practice, talk about best practice, and pursue excellence in practice. In spite of years of practice, I am fuzzy about what is  meant by and what distinguishes practice, a practice, and an area of practice.
  • How do we recognize and define practice? a practice? What distinguishes a practice from an activity or set of activities? How is practice different from expertise? What are some examples of a practice?

The Power of Place. Place matters. It matters to children discovering who they are, their world, and their place in it. Place matters to families growing and deepening connections to their communities. Place brings people together and can help them understand their connections to one another and their community.
  • In what ways does place inspire children’s museums? What qualities of place can be experienced in and around the museum? How can exhibits, programs, and experiences strengthen place-based connections for children? families?

If we don’t connect at the conference or you are not attending, I’d still like to hear your responses to these questions. Please share your thoughts to these questions here on Museum Notes or send them to my email: jwverg@earthlink.net.     

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Exploring the Reggio – Museum Connection


Reggio is a network of more than 30 centers and schools for young children from a few months old up to 6 years (and soon expanding) in the municipal schools of Reggio Emilia in northern Italy. Reggio is also a body of evolving pedagogical thought and practice infused with cultural values that take preschool into a public square.

Reggio Children

I was going to write about documentation, a Reggio-inspired practice that is attracting greater interest in school and museum settings in the US and world-wide. A spiraling, iterative, reflective process of following children, documentation involves gathering and interpreting traces of children’s work and words to give visibility to their thinking and discoveries that are present but we are not yet seeing. Using dialogue and collaboration, documentation is a tool to make us think again and deepen our consideration of what children are thinking and how they make meaning. I intended to place documentation in a museum context and explore its potential for giving visibility to children’s thinking, look at what’s working, and consider ways to support and extend their explorations.   

The writing process, however, has been messier and more of a tangle than usual. Tromping through the tangle to investigate has uncovered some important missing pieces. For starters, documentation is hard to encapsulate briefly. Note, for instance, the density of the “quick” overview in the previous paragraph; while long and involved, it barely unpacks what is significant about documentation. It is precisely the complexity of documentation that makes this rich, layered, generative cycle of observing, reflecting, interpreting, and revisiting a powerful tool for learning for children, teachers, and parents. A tool that “brings to light what usually escapes the eye,” according to Carlina Rinaldi is unlikely to be summed up in 5 or 10 words.

Adapting documentation to museum settings is also a challenge; fortunately an attractive one. But at the core of this tangle is making the connection between the Reggio-inspired approach and museums and their practices. Documentation is a set of practices embedded in a tightly connected pedagogy that is integrated in a system of public schools that have emerged from a community in a region in Italy over the last 60 years. Work to unpack those elements has to precede exploring documentation.  


Country, Culture, and Context
Adapting the Reggio approach from a northern Italian region to another country is less of a stretch than it
might first appear. These schools have evolved within their own historical and cultural context and are responsive to changing social needs. While internationally known and admired and an inspiration and source of energy for educators and parents in schools, childcare, homes, nature centers, community centers, and museums worldwide, the Municipal Infant Toddler Centers and Preschools of Reggio Emilia can only be in Reggio. They are rooted in a particular time and place; they cannot be replicated and cannot be transplanted wholesale to another city, Italian or otherwise.

Museums likewise value the rich web of local community and cultural references, relationships, and traditions and are grounded in their communities. Local context and priorities are expressed in missions, content, collections, and community engagement strategies. Occupying a public space with some prominence, museums are increasingly pursuing opportunities that grow their public value and are responsive to their community’s assets and needs.

A Tightly Connected Pedagogy
Reggio’s philosophical underpinnings are not new to museums familiar with Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. Early on, educators in Reggio Emilia read these same theorists and philosophers whose views are an inspiration for understanding learning as an active process, one in which learners construct knowledge through participation in activities, and one that occurs in a socio-cultural context.

While museums share these underpinnings, there are differences. Teachers in Reggio have not been bound by these theories but instead have used them to construct their own perspectives. They have, for instance, widened the idea of “language” stressed by Vygotsky to what they call the hundred languages of children, multiple symbolic and expressive forms of conveying thoughts and feeling. Significantly, the ideas of these philosophers and theorists are more fully embodied and made visible in Reggio practice than in museums and schools in the US and most countries. Practice with a high correspondence to theory is a function of, among other things, implementing the pedagogy and practices over 60 years with rigor and depth.

Image of the Child
Reggio Children
Reggio pedagogy also reflects a whole-hearted trust and confidence in children, their capabilities and potential. An image of the child as competent, rich in abilities, and motivated to engage with the world right from birth is at the very heart of the Reggio philosophy. The schools reflect and support the child’s curiosity and interests in developing relationships and investigating everything they encounter. Teachers prepare the environment, frame projects and support extended explorations where they are also partners in learning. So primary is the view of children as capable that it extends readily to an image of teachers and parents as competent. Children, parents, and teachers are partners in a community of learners.

Museums play out related ideas. Visitor-centered museums value the experiences, interests, and expectations of visitors and learners. Participatory museums view their audience and community as collaborators, experimenting with participatory design and exploring innovative uses of social media. In fact, many museums are exploring and experiencing a shift from viewing visitors, learners, and community members as consumers to co-creators of content and experiences.

The Environment
Reggio Children
In Reggio pedagogy a belief in the powerful influence of surrounding space is expressed as the environment as the third teacher. Children create meaning and make sense of their world in the context of the physical setting and through their constant interactions with it. Thoughtful preparation of spaces considers arrangement, the presence of natural light, use of color, objects, and materials, and attention to beauty to invite and support unhurried exploration, sustained engagement, communication, and changing relationships between people, ideas and the many possibilities for expressing novel connections.

Museum environments are valued as rich, dynamic environments full of information from objects, media, and people, released through social and physical interactions. At their best, they are convivial spaces as described by Kathleen McLean and Wendy Pollock that welcome and make people comfortable, foster relationships and inspire action. The contextual model of learning proposes that the individual’s museum learning experience depends on the physical and temporal as well as personal and social contexts.

Relationships
Relationships in Reggio are integral to the dynamic of learning and to the pedagogy itself. Relationships among children, between teachers and children, between home and school, between school and community form a system of connections that is dynamic and allows complexity. Reggio educators are quick to point out that the value of relationships is not limited to a warm and protective wrap. Instead, relationships operate actively, robustly, throughout the system, and towards a common purpose.     

For museums, relationships are an important and basic although less visible element of the dynamic. The powerful relationship between people and objects is often recognized as distinguishing museums from other settings. Museums also cultivate relationships with stakeholders and partners deliberately and effectively. Few museums, however, explicitly consider deep and sustained relationships as central to their purpose. Likewise, many museums focus on family learning, yet few view the relationships between family members as an object of engagement or support.


Creativity
Reggio schools value creativity as a characteristic of thinking, knowing, and making choices. Confident in children’s curiosity and motivation to explore and in the role of a supportive and engaging environment, Reggio educators view creativity as constructing new connections between thoughts and objects. Emerging from daily experience, creativity happens all the time and is not relegated to a creative hour of art. Creativity is more about the art of thinking than about art.

Interest in creativity in museums is also strong although with perhaps another emphasis. Creativity in museums appears to be more closely associated with art and less with learning. For children, creativity in museums is more likely viewed as art education or making art rather than as part of learning in a broader sense. Play often involves creativity but is typically viewed as imaginative play rather than as the construction of meaning.

Expressions of the tightly connected pedagogical philosophy and the interplay of ideas come through in countless other ways such as the atelier or studio spaces; projects that are extended explorations of themes and ideas; display of children’s work and words; and the power of documentation.


Where Differences Emerge
Overall, the alignment and resonance between Reggio pedagogy and museums is strong, from foundational theories to specific practices. There are, however, structural differences between the schools in Reggio, in fact any schools, and museums that affect how fully and in what ways this body of pedagogical thought can be adapted.

Schools are places children go everyday, usually 5 days a week for 9 months of the year. Museums are places children and adults visit occasionally, or if frequently, then irregularly. In a context where social and physical relationships are paramount as sources of encounter, connections, and communication among children, with the environment, between children and teachers, and between school and home, lively, regular, deep, and sustained engagement is limited. There is, as the Italian educators say, little or no continuity. Many practices such as projects and documentation rely on or significantly benefit from the continuity of daily relationships.

At the same time, museums offer another type of continuity–families visiting together. The parent-child relationship valued in the Reggio schools is well represented in museums. In many museums, 50% of visitors come in family groups. Many are members returning multiple times each year. For families visiting together, the web of relationships connects family members–often including grandparents–and the museum experience with home.

This structural difference is not insignificant nor is it insurmountable. The Reggio approach can be and is valued and implemented in museums. The spirit of the pedagogy can and does inspire practices across a variety of settings.
  • There are also networks like the Reggio-Inspired Network of Minnesota, a community of educators, parents and citizens who share an interest in the philosophy of the
 municipal preschools and infant-toddler centers of Reggio Emilia, Italy that is focused on growing the community of learners in schools, homes, and throughout the community.

This is a rich and generous pedagogy. It is rich in its thinking, in examples of constructing new perspectives from existing theories, and as a model of rigor and depth in its practice. It is generous to its learners viewed as strong, competent, and full of potential, whether they are children, teachers, parents, or the community. This community of educators in Reggio Emilia is open in sharing the unfolding educational project and in inviting others to join.


Other Resources