Sometimes when I’m asked what I do, I pause to think
how best to answer. Of course, I can and usually do reply that I am a museum
planner. I also say I am a consultant or an independent professional. Borrowing a term from baseball sometimes I
describe myself as a utility player. In
addition to being a strategic planner or developing learning frameworks, I step
into various roles to help build internal capacity. I coach, train, and sometimes
fill in for a senior staff. I sometimes round out a team, as an educator on one
team, an evaluator on another, or an experience developer on another. Serving
as a utility player works for me and I suppose it does for other consultants as
well.
Especially when I am asked
what my work is like, I am tempted to reply that I am part lightning rod, part chiropractor, and part editor. It
goes without saying that sometimes, I am all 3. This is not in any way a
complaint, but an evolving set of insights after 20 years of consulting and what
planning with museums involves.
Lightening
Rod.
Like the lightning rod atop a
building protecting a structure from a lightning strike, a consultant often attracts
an electric charge in the group, diverting it constructively. By nature of
their work and relationship to an organization, consultants often walk into
situations with which they are only somewhat familiar and connected. Yet, expectations
can be high that this outside specialist’s experience and expertise will not
only address the explicit task at hand, but also tackle other issues as well. A
mere secondary association with one issue can be enough to attract questions,
surface concerns, and set off a reaction. This is hardly surprising because without
the strong, on-going relationships among staff and board and with a limited
tenure, a consultant’s presence offers a relatively safe discharge of built-up
energy.
When lightening does
strike during a consultancy, it is likely to strike around what board and staff
don’t talk about or won’t address. Serving
as a lightning rod means listening for what is not being talked about, noticing
who is quiet, who interrupts, or who dominates the discussion. It means registering
what information is easy compared to seemingly impossible to come by. Along with glowing reports
of grants received, fantastic new board members, great attendance numbers, there might be little
mention of long-overdue raises, lack of meaningful follow-through on diversity
and inclusion efforts, or an overly active and less-than-transparent executive
committee. There might be a disproportionate mention of the past and how things
were back then.
Being a lightning rod is also
helpful when there is a boardroom bully, internal cliques, an unpaid founding
director who will not leave, or a board that has decided to dismiss the
executive director–the one who has arranged for the consultancy. Issues related
to a capital project, a compressed timeline, an unrealistic campaign goal, or
casually taking on debt, definitely attract a charge.
The first time and often
the second time of carrying the charge come as a surprise. Gradually, however, knowing
that the charge is likely and defusing it to help the museum, team or
individual move forward feels more like an opportunity. A well-placed question, a few sidebar
conversations, a new timeframe, rethinking the agenda, or calling the question can
open up dialogue, create a sense of relief, or allow a graceful exit for a needed departure.
Chiropractor.
When circumstances change, when an organization
grows, when pressures in one area of an organization mount, an organization and
its people can feel off-kilter and out of alignment. Lack of alignment can
place a drag on an organization’s performance and put a drain on its resources.
Its organizational efforts feel uncoordinated, difficult, and frustratingly unproductive.
At times like these, a
chiropractic yank can be what a museum needs. A good yank engages and aligns parts
of an organization, from guiding ideas, to organizational structure, audience, staff
and skills, resources, processes, and relationships with the community.
Museums, like any organization,
are complex and changing. Different aspects of the organization are affected by
and respond differently to various pressures and trends. Growth occurs at
different rates. Mindsets change more slowly than policies. The organizational
culture may be at odds with its current leadership style and community
expectations. Staff allocations in some departments may reflect 2003 workloads
or a mash-up of responsibilities added over the years.
Not surprisingly, the need
for a chiropractic tug often becomes apparent around periods of growth,
decline, and transition, whether planned and unplanned. This could be a sign of
healthy growth or an early warning signal of trouble.
In some cases a consultant
may help identify the need for rebalancing and identify what kind of tug is
needed and where. In other cases, a consultant’s work with a team or group
provides new skills and a nudge towards more coordinated action. Often, the
consultant’s work with the museum, developing a long-term plan or reimagining
the museum, activates the big yank and a ripple of adjustments.
Relatively small
adjustments like remixing teams and working groups will sometimes refresh and realign
work and energy. A strong new lens might be needed to jettison outdated programs
and partnerships; activities may still be cherished but have low relevance and place
a demand on resources. Larger adjustment, like a new vision and mission, a
strategic plan, restructured departments, and shifts in internal operations can
activate bigger change. Finally, for a museum facing a critical juncture, a turnaround
may be the organization-sized yank that is needed with restructured programs,
finances, management, and marketing strategies.
When key pieces are in
place, priorities clearly communicated with related accountability and
incentives, there’s alignment. When plans make sense and staff see their part
in the museum’s work and when teams work in a common direction towards a shared
purpose the chiropractic yank is accomplishing its goal.
Editor.
Museums are dynamic, productive settings, rich in possibilities. Ideas flow for exhibitions, fundraisers,
projects, strategies, partnerships, programs, and marketing strategies. Museums
translate their ideas and aspirations into multiple forms; they design, write,
share, publish, post, and send e-blasts. An exhibition opens and there are
programs, events, a social media campaign. A strategic plan takes shape and
there are 7 goals.
Nevertheless, there can be
too many ideas, too many priorities, too many words, images, and goals. The
fact is, not all ideas are worth pursuing, even ones held passionately. Not all
big ideas can be driving ideas. Not all ideas are right for a museum and work well
with other ideas connected to its broader purpose. Not all ideas are the right
size.
Sometimes the density of
ideas simply gets in the way. This can happen when group think rules, a team
chases every new idea, an idea won’t die, an organizational culture insists
more-ideas-are-better, or frank assessment of ideas is risky. Sorting through
the quality, quantity, and relevance of ideas, tasks, and language is an
enormous challenge.
Enter the consultant as
editor. A consultant can help trim, prune, prioritize, and sometimes take a
weed whacker to a thicket of ideas and goals. Removing the excess begins to
clear the view of what is important and what can be done well. Does a museum
need different gallery activities everyday? Does it even have the bench strength
to carry out this schedule? Are attendance projections overly optimistic? Are
there strategies for getting there? Are they clear? Realistic?
Editing not only trims the
number of strategies or goals to a manageable number, but also helps right-size
them, their objectives, and impacts for the museum.
As a consultant reflects
back what’s more and less important, a museum begins to find its own path
forward. Are these words in the museum’s voice? Is this where the museum can do
an outstanding job of delivering value because it has a record of achievement–not
just ambition? Editing exposes the strong ideas, links efforts that engage powerfully
with one another, and helps someone see their work, their role, or their
accomplishments in a new light.
If editing doesn’t work, a
chiropractic yank might do which illustrates a truism about these 3 roles. They
easily work together. Sometimes all 3 roles play out in quick succession. While
consultants frequent this territory, it is not exclusively theirs. When a
consultant isn’t around, anyone can and should step forward to move things along. Anyone can be on
the alert for questions that need to be asked, ideas that need to be explored,
lists that need to be trimmed, and voices that need to be heard.
Where does preservation/conservation of the collection that makes up the museum appear in your 3 roles???
ReplyDeleteYour question is helpful because it highlights the nature of these consultant roles. I view them as facilitating roles for advancing organizational thinking and decision making in various ways. Sometimes a consultant might be a lightning rod (editor or chiropractor) around questions related to the preservation/conservation of the collection–or related to education or marketing. In facilitating a group's working together and consideration of what it wants to accomplish (and it may be around the collection, audience, interpretation, community presence, subject matter, or practices in any of these areas), the need (or opportunity) for the consultant to play one of these roles can present itself. In any case, these 3 roles always engage with the significant internal knowledge and expertise–including preservation/conservation of the collection that is embedded in a museum–as well as with the current issues and players. I hope this addresses your question.
ReplyDelete