I am admittedly
drawn to many of the big roomy ideas that float through museums: public value,
curiosity, engagement, interactive, relevance, play, creativity, participation, and dialogue. At the same time, I cringe when I hear or read these same words and
ideas used constantly whether appropriately or not. Too much use without rigorous
and thoughtful consideration to probe a word for meaning flattens our language
and our thinking.
But,
I very much like big roomy ideas that are probed, pummeled, unpacked, and
played out to deepen and internalize understanding and transform a casual word
into a powerful tool for thinking, working, and creating change. Nina Simon has
done this and more in her most recent book, The Art of Relevance.
As CEO at the Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History (MAH), at
science centers and children’s museums she has worked, as a consultant with
museums, and as author of Museum 2.0 and The Participatory Museum, Nina
has honed her sensibilities about and a belief in the potential of relevance to
transform lives and institutions.
What
Is Relevance?
Before delving
into her extensive pursuit of relevance, Nina takes time to explore it from various
perspectives. She begins by grounding this construct in the work of two
cognitive scientists, Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber. Two criteria make
information relevant to someone: new conclusions that matter to that person (positive
cognitive effect) and the effort required to absorb it–lower effort, higher
relevance. Thinking about eating bacon, choosing a movie, and commemorating the
origin of surfing in the Americas, Nina uses the criteria to explore the
construct and its capacity across a range of situations: a painting, a museum
tour, cemetery caretaking, soup, or a Laundromat.
She also
takes a few passes at what relevance is and isn’t. Relevance, for instance, is
not about familiarity, but familiarity does reduce effort, encourages trying, and
assists in making meaning. She challenges easy assumptions: what we do is
relevant to everyone and relevance is universal.
After
framing relevance, Nina looks at efforts to build relevance in a wide range of situations
and settings. She has selected stories of individuals and groups at museums,
libraries, visitor centers, zoos, theaters, and parks. Sketch-by-sketch, she
makes relevance less abstract, exposing its inherent complexity, and recognizing
the hard work involved in someone’s unlocking meaning.
• The
Monterey Bay Aquarium shifts their research work to advocacy by responding to
their visitors’ interest in positive action.
• The New
World Symphony in Miami does the work to reduce the effort for young urban
adults to find relevance in classical music.
• The
Foster Youth Museum In Oakland evolves forms of displays to empower foster
youth to share their stories.
• The
Cleveland Public Library makes room for outsiders by serving lunch to
low-income kids during the summer.
These stories,
fascinating, poignant and heartening, help clarify how connections are being
made and being made to matter to a person or community. Embedded in the stories
are innovative and alternative methods and techniques for relationship and
community building useful in other institutions. Periodically, Nina returns to
the two criteria for making information relevant and sharpening our own sense
of relevance.
The mini-case
studies of people, places, partners, and projects become even more valuable
with Nina’s reflective analysis woven into each. Here is where she makes fine
distinctions. Here is where she highlights the importance of place, choices
that made a difference, the limitations of painfully broad descriptions of
communities, and the value of personal stories. Here is practical advice for
getting started, moving ahead, or working around obstacles: get outside,
listen, meet people, identify leaders. Just as Nina wholeheartedly describes a
project, idea, or change, she wholeheartedly tugs at its parts to expose
obstacles, highlight what works, and make connections.
In a
sense, the book is personal and that matters in bringing depth, honesty, and
complexity to an idea that could remain in pop culture land. Nina refers to this
book as “field notes” from her journey in pursuit of relevance. Her experiences
as an insider and an outsider, the twists and turns of projects, and her
evolving working definition of relevance personalize the work and make it
accessible. She breaks down MAH’s Community First process, questions, uncertainty,
admiration, and insights. A champion of relevance, she also acknowledges its
limitations.
A clear
intention to apply her insights on relevance appears to be built into the
book’s structure, approach, and language. On the front page of each chapter,
2-3 succinct ideas summarize the chapter, previewing for us what’s ahead. Rigorous
thinking, abundant examples, and engaging stories help illustrate complex
ideas.
Throughout,
she finds ways to involve us in ways that matter, placing us in the shoes of a
zoo director or reminding us that, “We are all grumbly insiders about
something.” She has a fluency with images weaving an image of relevance as a key throughout the book. Skillfully and
creatively she extends it to a door that opens to a room full of experience, welcoming,
wonderful, valuable. The room, she notes, can be made bigger–together.
The book
is compact. You could breeze through
it, but you wouldn't ’want to. You’d miss what Nina has carefully tucked into
her stories, drawn from her experiences, and her encouragement to create
relevant work.
… And
More
In The
Art of Relevance Nina unpacks, explores, and reflects on relevance in ways that
can bring a museum’s core ideas to life, beyond what is often imagined. She not
only does this well, but she does more.
She shows
what skills and strategies like empathy, perspective taking, commitment, and
collaboration look like and the work they do to make a difference. In relating
relevance to mission, core values, defining communities, programming, and measuring
success Nina is creating a constellation of ideas that guide organizations in
planning, navigating dynamic environments, and making a difference. Sharp
observations, like the urge to entertain as a serious distraction from
relevance, are critical considerations for marshaling focus and building
momentum to transform lives and institutions.
The Art
of Relevance has made me reflect on past efforts to forge meaningful
connections with partners, draw outsiders in, bring community voices into
the planning process, and sustain relationships. It has made me think of revisiting past Museum
Notes posts and of new perspectives for future ones.
When you
begin a quest for greater relevance, you don’t just answer one question. You
answer more, learn more, think more about change. In the book’s Preface, Jon
Moscone, director of the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco notes
that, “The challenge of relevance is complex and deep.” I would add, “and
forever.” Relevance takes hard work, time, and dedicated friends and partners. It
will be easier with The Art of Relevance.